The far left wants to have “conversations” about all sorts of topics in an effort to “meet in the middle”… which in the real world means giving up natural and civil rights for tyranny.
Take this flake at the Huffington Post:
Justin Curmi: A blogger that seeks to engage people in thought and conversation through presenting new views to matters, new or old.
Here’s what Justin Curmi wrote at the Huffington Post, seemingly between sessions of huffing gold spray paint.
A Revision on the Bill of Rights, Part III
…The main problem with the notion of self-defense is it imposes on justice, for everyone has the right for a fair trial. Therefore, using a firearm to defend oneself is not legal because if the attacker is killed, he or she is devoid of his or her rights.
And is it any wonder we don’t want to engage these special snowflakes in “conversations”?
It’s funny, I have always thought that the lack of a trial had MANY benefits, and that’s why self defense shootings were so…beneficial. Benefits like the lack of tax money for a defense lawyer, because, let’s face it, these idiots rarely can provide their own. The lack of tax money for court fees. The lack of tax money to house and feed these animals for the length of their sentence. Not having to worry about them doing it again when they get out. Probably the most important, though, not having to worry about them suing you WHEN they lie about what happened. Screw this justin curmi, I hope he becomes a victim of a home invasion sooner than later, and then I’ll be looking for his retraction.
Someone ought to introduce justin curmi to the personal pronoun; it, too, is your friend!
I assume he wrote his own byline?
“Justin Curmi: A blogger that seeks to engage people in thought and conversation through presenting new views to matters, new or old.”
Justing curmudgeon, the “blogger” who would, presumably, write for a living, doesn’t know that the proper writing of this would have been: “A blogger WHO seeks to engage………..?”
Pathetic. Ah, but then again, it is the puffington host we’re talking about, isn’t it? It’s not like they have any ethical or journalistic standards!
Jesus. So self-defense is not legal because the bad guy doesn’t get a trial?
It’s never good enough for liberals. Here in Illinois, we had the death penalty after a trial. But the liberals changed the goalposts, claiming the trials weren’t “fair”.
I have no liberal friends. And today I’m reminded why.
Sam
In law a man is guilty when he violates the rights of others. In ethics he is guilty if he only thinks of doing so. –Immanuel Kant
Someone needs to kick Justin’s ass after they are done with said ass kicking ask him if he still feels the same way.
You are aware that due process is a burden placed on the GOVERNMENT, not on individuals, right?
I don’t owe you due process.
I don’t owe you freedom of speech.
I don’t owe you protection from illegal search or seizures.
If you don’t like it, you can leave.
If you try to take your way by force, the only thing anyone will owe you is a trip to the morgue.